Gingrich admits it’s an oil war
MR. BUCHANAN: …In my judgment, Chris, this one-sided support for Sharon, the refusal to condemn that wall snaking through the West Bank, the agreement to support Sharon's claim to virtually half of the West Bank, this has caused enormous hostility and animosity and hatred for this country in that part of the world, not just among the Palestinians. And if we want to drain off some of this hatred, this venom against us, we have got to adopt a more evenhanded policy here…
…This is the fundamental point. Are they attacking us because of who we are and what they believe or are they attacking us because of what we do? I believe it is our policies, not our principles that are causing these attacks. Osama bin Laden wasn't sitting in some cave in Afghanistan and stumble on the Bill of Rights and go bananas…
MR. GINGRICH: …what Pat said is true but people have to listen carefully to what he said. He said basically if we would pull out of the biggest oil region on the planet, allow people like bin Laden to dominate the oil supply of the entire industrial world…
…Try to describe a world in which for the last 35 or 40 years, the U.S. has not provided stability for world's oil supply and you're describing a world where you have $200 or $300 a barrel gasoline…
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5921259/
1 Comments:
I don't know which is worse--the honest yet amazingly callous or hypocritical cause they know what they are doing is completely unacceptable. :-(
Honesty is good, but If it means that someone is so completely self absorbed that they can dismiss morality . [Shiver.]
Post a Comment
<< Home