Election Fraud? Part Two
My cousin sent me a good link:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm.
This link has tabulated results from Florida by county:
http://uscountvotes.org/.
According to their site, of the 7+ million votes cast in Florida, Bush had a reported margin of victory of less than 400,000 votes. However, in counties using optical scan machines, he received about 600,000 votes more than the expected results based on party registration, after you subtract Kerry’s increase. Ironically, the e-touch screen counties did not show the same difference. This could be because those counties received more scrutiny from poll watchers.
I also watched and enjoyed the Votergate movie on http://www.votergate.tv/, a documentary in the style of "Fahrenheit 9/11."
posted by Tom Cleland @ 11/30/2004 06:49:00 PM
10 comments
10 Comments:
From Ohio, Ted emailed, “It was well documented that some places had huge lines and I think students at Seton Hall University stood in line up to 10 - 14 hours. And 2 hour waits were common in many urban areas with large black populations.”
These long lines in Ohio are scandalous enough for me!
..Thanks for the Votergate movie information. I hope to get to it soon.
I had some problems with their online movie player, but rebooted and continued.
I wonder if anyone filmed any of those long lines.
My cousin sent me the following link on Florida. It has some serious allegations of a coverup and murder. It mentions some documents but I got confused about which were the real ones. If someone could summarize it and highlight the smoking gun that would be great.
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/120604Madsen/120604madsen.htmlThe article mentions Volusia County, where Bev Harris's team allegedly found poll tapes in the garbage. The earlier statistics at http://uscountvotes.org/, however only show a 34% boost there for Bush compared to a 26% boost for Kerry. Not as damning as in the other counties. Did they want to cheat less there, or could they be messing with us?
One claim mentioned on NPR today is that the inadequate voting machines in Ohio were controlled and administered by Democrats. Why would they mess up their own precincts? If true, I can answer that one. It would fit in with my theory that Kerry wasn’t serious about winning.
And what about this Conyers hearing? Was Conyers helpful? Were the Kerry people accounted for?
20 Amazing Facts about Voting in the USA:
http://www.nightweed.com/usavotefacts.html
Did Diebold and ES&S change leadership, or did the “20 Amazing Facts” switch around the job titles of company President and Vice President? A Yahoo search on the “Urosevich” brothers lists a number of articles claiming that Bob is President of Diebold and Todd is VP of ES&S.
Sheryl points out that the current Vice President for Diebold is Gregory T. Geswein, and the ES&S President is Aldo Tesi.
Sheryl also points out: Where it says that "there is no federal agency with regulatory oversight over the US voting machine industry." I believe the Elections Assistance Commission was created by the Help America Vote Act for that very purpose. Not that I think they are doing a great job. Plus I don't think they ever got an inspector general to keep them honest with audits.
Conyers was on Ed Schultz and said he thinks a Senator will challenge the results this time. If the Ohio recount was stalled and the ballot evidence is in question, then a revote, not a recount, is in order.
Just signed the petition at http://www.contestthevote.org/
Post a Comment
<< Home