2009 5CDGP IRV Straw Poll Results

Held Sept. 13. Raw numbers are in square brackets after the name. There were 12 voters.

MAYOR
1. 58% Al Flowers [7+1=8+1=9]
2. 17% Papa John Kolstad [2+0=2]
2. 17% R.T. Rybak [2+0=2]
4. 08% James R. Everett [1]
(Of the 58% for Al Flowers, second choices were 33% Kolstad, 17% NOTA, and 8% Bob Carney Jr.)

WARD 1
1. 38% None of the Above (43% 2nd round, 100% 3rd round) [3+0=3+1=4]]
2. 25% Larry Ranallo [2+0=2]
2. 25% Kevin Reich [2+0=2]
4. 12% Thomas Alessi [1]

WARD 2
1. 75% Cam Gordon [6+0=6+2=8] (Third-round votes are shown here.)
2. 12% Allen A. Aigbogun [1]
2. 12% None of the Above [1]
(Of the 75% for Cam Gordon, second choices were 38% NOTA, 25% Aigbogun, and 12% blank.)

WARD 3
1. 54% Melissa Hill [6+0=6]
2. 27% Allen Kathir [3+1=4]
3. 18% Diane Hofstede [2]
(Of the 54% for Melissa Hill, second choices were 54% Kathir.)

WARD 4
1. 90% Marcus Harcus [9]
2. 10% Barb Johnson [1]
(Of the 90% for Marcus Harcus, second choices were 30% Troy Parker, 30% Grant Cermak, 20% blank, and 10% NOTA.
Of the 60% second choices for Cermak and Parker, third choices were 20% NOTA, 20% blank, 10% Parker, and 10% Cermak.)

WARD 5
1. 64% Natalie Johnson Lee [7]
2. 27% Kenya McKnight [3]
3. 09% Don Samuels [1]
(Of the 64% for Natalie Johnson Lee, second choices were 45% McKnight, 9% NOTA, and 9% blank.)

WARD 6
1. 91% Andy Exley [10]
2. 09% None of the Above [1]
(Of the 91% for Andy Exley, second choices were 73% M. Cali, 9% Bruce A. Lundeen, 9% Michael Tupper.
Of the 73% second choices for Cali, third choices were 27% Lundeen, 18% NOTA, 9% Laura Jean, 9% Tupper, 9% blank.)

WARD 7
1. 64% Michael Katch [7]
2. 27% Ken Lawrence [3]
3. 09% None of the Above [1]
(Of the 64% for Michael Katch, second choices were 36% Lawrence, 9% Jeffrey Alan Wagner, 9% NOTA, and 9% blank.)

WARD 8
1. 100% Jeanine Estimé [11]
(Of the 100% for Jeanine Estimé, second choices were 73% Michael Cavlan, 9% Elizabeth Glidden, 9% NOTA, and 9% blank.
Of the 73% second choices for Cavlan, third choices were 27% Gregory McDonald, 27% NOTA, 9% David Regan, and 9% blank.)

WARD 9
1. 82% Dave Bicking [9]
2. 09% Gary Schiff [1]
2. 09% None of the Above [1]
(Of the 82% for Dave Bicking, second choices were 36% Todd J. Eberhardy, 18% blank, 9% Khalif Jama, 9% Schiff, and 9% NOTA.)

WARD 10
1. 40% Dan Alvin (56% second round) [4+1=5]
2. 40% None of the Above (44% second round) [4+0=4]
3. 10% Meg Tuthill [1]
3. 10% Kim Vlaisavljevich [1]

WARD 11
1. 62% None of the Above [5+1=6]
2. 25% John Quincy [2+0=2]
3. 12% Gregg A. Iverson [1]

WARD 12
1. 60% Charlie Underwood [6+1=7]
2. 20% Brent Perry [2]
2. 20% None of the Above [2]
(Of the 60% for Charlie Underwood, second choices were 20% Perry, 20% NOTA, 10% Sandy Colvin Roy, 10% blank.)

WARD 13
1. 70% Kris Broberg [7+1=8]
2. 20% None of the Above [2]
3. 10% Joseph Henry [1]
(Of the 70% for Kris Broberg, second choices were 40% Joseph Henry, 20% blank, and 10% Betsy Hodges.)

BOARD OF ESTIMATE AND TAXATION
1. 58% Carol Jean Becker [7]
2. 33% DeWayne Townsend [4]
3. 08% Phil Willkie [1]

PARK BOARD AT LARGE
1. 67% Annie Young [6]
2. 22% None of the Above [2]
3. 11% Nancy Bernard [1]

PARK BOARD DISTRICT 1
1. 57% Liz Wielinski [4]
2. 29% None of the Above [2]
3. 14% Bernie Kunza [1]

PARK BOARD DISTRICT 2
1. 62% Jon Olson [5]
2. 25% None of the Above [2]
3. 12% Michael Guest [1]

PARK BOARD DISTRICT 3
1. 38% None of the Above (57% second round) [3+1=4]
2. 38% Scott Vreeland (43% second round) [3+0=3]
3. 25% Mike Wendorf [2]

PARK BOARD DISTRICT 4
1. 56% Anita Tabb [5]
2. 44% None of the Above [4]

PARK BOARD DISTRICT 5
1. 43% None of the Above (50% second round) [3+0=3]
1. 29% Jason Stone (50% second round) [2+1=3]
3. 14% Steve Barland [1]
3. 14% Carol Kummer [1]

PARK BOARD DISTRICT 6
1. 57% None of the Above [4+2=6]
2. 14% Meg Fourney [1]
2. 14% Brad Bourn [1]
2. 14% Geneva Hanvik [1]

RULES

Ballots will be counted using IRV. The candidate with the least number of first-choice votes will be eliminated and will come in last. The next candidate to be eliminated will come in next-to-last, and so on. Ties will remain as ties. The elimination process will continue regardless of whether a candidate has reached 50 percent, until all candidates have an order of placement.

“None of the above” will be an option in each race. It will be treated the same as any other candidate for purposes of this straw poll.